Investigations – Depth Matters

Team at National Safety Services Inc. Canada conducting a collaborative incident investigation workshop using sticky notes on a whiteboard.

Introduction

When it comes to incident investigations, depth matters - OHS Canada Magazine

Incident investigations are a critical process for any organization to identify the root causes of incidents, near misses, or other undesired events. They often reveal weaknesses in existing safety systems, protocols, training, or equipment.  

However, if an investigation is done poorly, incompletely or lightly, it can be counterproductive and leave deficiencies unaddressed. It is important that only competent personnel conduct incident investigations. 

Doing a proper investigation requires the investigator to look into the facts of the incident beyond the superficial details. It’s easy to blame the worker and then make the corrective action to “discuss in the safety meeting” but this doesn’t address the real causes or contributing factors and won’t prevent the incident from occurring again. Unfortunately, investigations are not often conducted sufficiently and completed without drilling down into why it occurred in the first place, leaving superficial findings. Often this is due to lack of investigator experience or training, time pressure to get an investigation report out or reluctance to expose greater system faults in the organization.

Let’s discuss the levels of investigation depth that can occur. For example, if the incident that occurred involved the following details, what levels of investigation depth might we see from subsequent reports?

"A worker was walking down the administrative building east hallway, traveling north towards the warehouse when they slipped and fell, spraining their wrist."

Levels of Investigation Depth Examples

Superficial Investigation (Blame the Worker)

Basic Investigation (Looking at Immediate Causes)

Deeper Investigation (Examining Contributing Factors)

Root Cause Investigation (Systems Thinking)

What techniques are used? 

All investigations should follow the process of securing the scene, collecting evidence, conducting interviews and creating a timeline. Investigation techniques may differ in the methodology for determining cause, but the fundamental concept of determining causes is the same. 

Various methodologies may differ in their approach and tools for causal analysis in an investigation. Here are some examples: 

1. The Five Why’s (5 Why’s) 

The Five Whys is a problem-solving technique used to explore the root cause of an issue by asking “why” five times in succession. Each “why” question digs deeper into the reasons behind a problem, gradually revealing its underlying causes.

2. Systemic Cause Analysis Technique (SCAT) 

SCAT (Systematic Cause Analysis Technique) is a widely used methodology for structured analysis of incidents. SCAT looks at predefined categories of loss events, starting with the loss and working backward to the event, and ending with causes and control measures to minimize the recurrence of the event. Investigators can select from a chart that provides event types, immediate/direct and basic/underlying causes, and lack of control measures that are related to the incident. 

3. TapRooT® (Techniques for Human Error Reduction and Root Cause Analysis) 

TapRooT® is a systematic process for investigating incidents, identifying root causes and implementing effective corrective actions. It involves a structured approach to gather and analyze information about an incident, including what happened, why it happened and what can be done to prevent recurrence. 

TapRooT® uses a series of tools and techniques, including the SnapCharT® (Sequence of Events), Root Cause Tree®, and Corrective Action Helper®, to guide investigators through the analysis process.

4. Cause Mapping® (Method of Root Cause Analysis)

The Think Reliability Cause Mapping method is a structured, visual approach to root cause analysis that focuses on identifying and understanding cause-and-effect relationships in problem investigations. It uses a simple “why” questioning technique to break down complex issues into a logical flowchart, helping organizations pinpoint the root causes of failures rather than just symptoms.

Team member at National Safety Services Inc. Canada analyzing a root cause analysis diagram on a blue wall covered with sticky notes during an incident investigation session.

Conclusion:

These are just a few examples of incident investigation methods, and there are many other approaches and tools available, including the analysis of human factors that may have contributed to an event, such as fatigue, workloads, miscommunications, or cognitive biases. The choice of method depends on factors such as the nature of the incident, the complexity of the investigation as well as the preferences and expertise of the investigation team. 

Volume Registrations

Our checkout process is only configured to capture information about one participant at a time. Each enrollment will need to be purchased individually using the checkout process. For larger enrollment requirements, please reach out to National Safety at support@nationalsafety.ca for support and bulk rate information.

Bulk purchases require the same mandatory information as individual purchases. In order to assist you in preparing for a bulk purchase, we have provided a downloadable “User Information Intake File” for you to begin compiling the required information.

Contact Our Support Team

If you have any questions, please reach out to us and our support team will get back to you within 24 hours.